Should the US Government Be Able to Shut Down Internet Sites for Content Piracy and Copyright Infringement Without Due Process?

Issue: PIPA / SOPA – LEGISLATION REGULATING INTERNET CONTENT: Do you favor these proposed bills that attempt to prevent online copyright infringemen and content piracy but which can also limit free speech and shut down websites without due process?  

Uncle Sam w fistSummary:  PIPA and SOPA or the Open Act? Both SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act) and PIPA (Enforcing and Protecting American Rights Against Sites Intent on Theft and Exploitation Act) are currently on hold in Congress because legislative support in both houses has decreased considerably based on the public outcry against them. The two articles below will provide arguments for and against these proposed pieces of legislation.

Below are links to articles discussing both sides of this issue as to SOPA and PIPA:

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57360665-503544/sopa-pipa-what-you-need-to-know/

http://www.pcworld.com/article/248298/sopa_and_pipa_just_the_facts.html

http://www.1stwebdesigner.com/design/how-sopa-pipa-can-affect-you/

To overcome the problems of PIPA and SOPA, Daryl Issa (R-CA) has proposed the OPEN Act as an alternative. This legislation is explained below:

http://www.pcworld.com/article/248525/sopa_pipa_stalled_meet_the_open_act.html

To eVote and send your opinion directly to YOUR Elected Reps on this issue, please fill out the form below. Your eVote will also be tallied in real time in eVoiceAmerica’s Yes/No Percentage graph for this issue, and your anonymous opinion will be posted as a comment on this issue.

Keystone XL Pipeline: UPDATE as of 12/15/11

Issue: KEYSTONE XL PIPLINE APPROVAL: Should Keystone XL, the oil pipeline from Canada toTexas/the Gulf of Mexico, be built to create construction and construction-related jobs?

Summary: Canada has offered to build a 1,700-mile, $7-13B pipeline from Alberta to the Gulf of Texas. This pipeline would transport synthetic crude oil to numerous refineries along its 1,700-mile route. See Pros and Cons below. In November, President Obama delayed the decision to build this pipeline until after the 2012 presidential election based upon route and environmental considerations. In response, a new route, bypassing environmentally sensitive areas, was approved by Nebraska’s governor, legislature and TransCanada but no approval yet by President Obama.   

UPDATE: To expedite approval, the House of Representatives included language requiring the building of this pipeline as part of their legislation to extend the Social Security Payroll Tax Holiday Bill (HR3630) which was passed in the House on 12/13/11. You can easily email your personal opinion to YOUR senators on how you want them to vote on this bill (HR3630) (and the pipeline) by filling out the opinion form below.  Your opinoins should be submitted before Saturday, 12/17/11, the day of the vote on this bill.

Call for Elena Kagan’s Recusal from the Supreme Court Hearing on Obamacare

  •  Issue: Should Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan recuse (voluntarily withdraw) herself from the upcoming Supreme Court hearing on Obamacare since, as the solicitor general under Obama, she actively participated in drafting this law for potential defense in front of the Supreme Court and, for this specific reason, federal statute requires her do so?
  •  Summary: The Supreme Court will hearing various lower court decisions on the constitutionality of Obamacare in the Spring of 2012. It will be deciding whether the individual mandate that all Americans participate in the national healthcare program or be fined this is a violation of the 10th Amendment/Commerce clause (theUS government’s authority to regulate interstate commerce). Elena Kagan is the most recent Supreme Court justice appointed by President Obama and will be on the bench for the hearing on this matter. She was also solicitor general when Obamacare was being drafted and passed by Congress.
Elena Kagan on US Supreme Court

Photo of U.S. Supreme Court Justices

  •  Pro-Recusal Arguments: Many think that Kagan should recuse (voluntarily excuse) herself from this hearing since she participated, as solicitor general on behalf of the Obama administration, and since she/her department advised those drafting this bill on its wording in anticipation that it would be appealed to higher courts by its opponents. If this is true, she should recuse herself as having a conflict of interest and lack of objectivity needed to be an unbiased jurist.

Kagan’s necessary recusal” by Rep. John Fleming, M.D. (Rep. R-LA) (Washington Times; 12/6/11)

Kagan should recuse herself from Obamacare deliberations” by Examiner Editorial (Washington Examiner.com; 11/21/11)

  • Anti-Recusal Arguments: Others are of the opposite opinion – that the documents produced by the White House and her confirmation testimony before Congress regarding Kagan’s involvement do not show sufficient involvement by her to require her to recuse herself.

Conflicts not enough for recusals on health care case (Washington Post; 12/5/11)

The ObamaCare Recusal Nonsense” by Michael Mulkasey (Wall Street Journal; 12/5/11)

  • eVote Your Opinion to the Supreme Court and Your Elected Reps in Washington: If you wish to send your opinion on Kagan’s recusal, please fill out the form below and your opinion will be sent directly to the Supreme Court, your eVote will be tallied in real time in eVoiceAmerica’s Yes/No Percentage graph for this issue, and your anonymous opinion will be posted as a comment on this Post.

To write your opinion on this issue to your elected reps in Washington using eVoiceAmerica.com, click here Should Justice Kagan recuse herself?

Effective Emails to Elected Reps

How to Effectively Email Your Elected Representatives Using eVoiceAmerica.com

Those who think that elected representatives pay great attention to constituent email are correct. Concise, civil, courteous, respectful, and well thought out, personal emails are one of the most effective ways Americans have of influencing law-makers… eVoiceAmerica.com gives Americans and easy way to do this.

Make it Personal

Your vote helps elect them — or not — and that fact alone carries a lot of weight. Your eVoice emails are your personalized opinions which add even more weight as contrasted with sending the same “cookie-cutter” message to every member of Congress (e.g., alerts and petitions) which may grab attention but rarely much consideration.

Keep it Simple, Courteous, Civil, and Respectful

Your eVoice email will include the Topic and issue statement, your Yes/No eVote, and your personal opinion. Many political activism groups recommend including as many of the following elements as your time allows:

1. Who you are (I am a _______ with XXX education, or am unemployed, etc.), and your position on this issue.

2.  Provide as much detail as you have. Be factual not emotional. Provide specific rather than general information about how the topic affects you and others. If a certain bill is involved, cite the correct title or number whenever possible.

3.  Close by requesting the action you want taken: a vote for or against a bill, or change in general policy.

The best letters are courteous, civil and respectful, and to the point.

Now You Can Easily Email Your Elected Reps in Washington on political, economic, social and cultural issues. The more often you, your family, and friends use eVoiceAmerica to send your personal opinions, the greater the impact of the eVoiceAmerica community on policy and legislation. eVoiceAmerica also adds and eVote to your opinions and captures it so, for the first time in history, Americans can know, through eVoice, what we are telling our reps and they know that we know what they know – accountability from the outside.

Potential U.S. Bailout of European Banks

European Dollars

U.S. Bailout of European Dollars

 

  • Issue: Potential U.S. Bailout of European Banks: Should Congress pass legislation prohibiting the Obama administration, the Fed, and the Treasury Department from making a U.S. taxpayer-funded contribution to stabilize/bailout Europe through the International Monetary Fund (IMF)?

 

Posted on 12/5/11 by Sandra

  • eVoiceAmerica Issue Summary: President Obama has told European leaders that theUS will “do its part” to avert the failure of the Euro (by a bailout funded by US taxpayers). The Fed and the President have acted to this end without informing the American people, without debate in or consulting Congress, or public discourse on the short- and long-term risks, the amount, and the effects on the American and European economies by Fed manipulations of the dollar vs. the Euro.
  • Whether a US taxpayer bailout will solve Europe’s solvency problem:

According to the NewAmerican.com on 12/1/11: “’We should be under no illusion about today’s action by the Federal Reserve,’ said Rep. Dan Burton (R-Ind.) in a statement. ‘The Federal Reserve’s decision to allow European banks to borrow American dollars cheaply, combined with the Administration’s action earlier in the week to double the United States financial contribution to the International Monetary fund is nothing more or less than a U.S. taxpayer bailout of Europe.’

“Rep. Burton said that even though markets may have reacted positively to the newest bailout announcement, the long-term consequences will be devastating. ‘This boondoggle will only serve to further devalue our currency, increase inflation pressures, worsen our ability to rebound from the likely failure of the Euro, and make it that much harder to solve America’s own crushing financial problems,’ he noted.

“’Like the American government,’ Burtonsaid, ‘European authorities do not have a revenue problem, they have a spending problem. And throwing American taxpayer money at the crisis will not solve the problem anymore than President Obama’s failed “stimulus” plan solved America’s woes,’ he concluded.

“The coordinated central-bank easing policy, of course, will cause a depreciation in the value of all existing money. And it won’t even come close to solving the underlying problems, according to analysts.

“Thomas Eddlem in a piece for The New American. ‘Yes, markets received a sense of security from the central banks’ action. But it is a false sense of security before the looming debt crisis breaks.’

“The new coordinated central bank policy is not the first time Americans have been forced to bail out European recent years. The Fed has been exposed secretly pumping trillions of dollars into European banks throughout the crisis.

And as the largest single contingent of contributors, U.S. taxpayers have long been partially financing all of the so-called “rescue” packages floated by the IMF. Lawmakers were furious back then, too.

“’The bailout of Greece set a dangerous precedent of using American tax dollars for other European bailouts,’ complained Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.) in a statement late last year. ‘Now Americans are waking up to the harsh reality that they may be on the hook to keep the Euro afloat as well.’”

According the The Hill Magazine on 12/2/11: “Conservatives say they will try to block the International Monetary Fund from bailing out Italy and Spain, which they say could leave U.S. taxpayers with a huge bill.

“Republicans on both sides of the Capitol complain that the Obama administration has refused to share details of what Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner is discussing with European leaders amid reports the IMF could intervene.

“Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) says he is planning legislation directing theU.S.government to veto an expanded role for the fund.

“Senate Republican Steering Committee Chairman Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) and Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (Wash.), a member of the House Republican leadership, also have legislation to curb the proposed intervention.

“’I’m adamantly against the IMF being involved in this,’ Coburn said.

“’We’re throwing good money after bad down a hole that I think is not a solvable problem,’ he said.

“’Europeis going to default eventually, so why would you socialize their profligate spending,’ he added.

“Coburn estimates theU.S.could be liable for as much as $176 billion if the IMF shores upItalyandSpainand the European Union collapses.

“President Obama this week said the U.S. ‘stands ready to do our part’ to help resolve the crisis, and Geithner in October said using U.S. tax dollars through the IMF to shore up Europe’s efforts was appropriate.

“DeMint offered an amendment to the defense authorization bill instructing the U.S. executive director of the IMF to use the voice and vote of the United States to oppose funding of the European Financial Stability Facility, the bailout fund that would be used to stabilize countries at risk of default.

“’We need some transparency about what’s really going on,’ said McMorris Rodgers. ‘It’s hard to get information. We’re talking aboutU.S.taxpayer dollars being involved in the European bailout. The administration needs to be honest with the Congress. I believe Congress needs to be involved in making this decision.’

“But Coburn and other Republicans are skeptical their effort will be successful. They expect Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) to prevent the Senate from voting on legislation to blockU.S.funds from being used in an IMF bailout.

“Even if it passes Congress, Coburn says President Obama would likely veto the legislation.”

According the Curious Capitalist on 11/30/11: The bottom-line truth about today’s Federal Reserve-led coordinated effort by six of the developed worlds’ central banks to ease the liquidity problems of European financial institutions is this: It doesn’t change anything. European leaders still have the same tough decision to make. Either impose even stricter austerity measures on Europe’s struggling nations or force Germany and other stronger European nations to come forward with an even bigger bailout, or, of course, kiss the Euro good-bye.
Another wrinkle: If the move leads to an even bigger bailout the result could be a new round of inflation, particularly in the emerging market countries. That would lead to more rate hikes inChina and elsewhere, which could slow the entire global economy.

To write your opinion on this issue to your elected reps in Washington using eVoiceAmerica.com, click here Potential U.S. Bailout of European Insolvency

Issue: Freedom of Speech on Private Property

Issue: FREEDOM OF SPEECH ON PRIVATE PROPERTY

SUMMARY: Abuse by HOAs: National concerns have been gaining momentum over the efforts of a number of homeowner association (HOA) board members to infringe on civil and property rights of homeowners with whom they disagree politically and to make arbitrary and mandatory assessments against home/condo owners for unwarranted, unnecessary improvements, among other things. In extreme circumstances, some have even lost their homes to foreclosure to the HOA for seemingly minor violations 10 Things You Don’t Know about HOAs. The disadvantages are numerous restrictions, the violation of which can be very expensive and even punitive. HOA history 25% or 62,500 people are dissatisfied with their HOA experience.

Benefits of HOAs: In 1965 there were 500 HOAs, now there are 250,000. The benefits of HOAs are that they are more likely to maintain the property values of a development and offer neighborhood amenities, services, and security/safety that individual homeowners couldn’t afford. HOA history 75% or 187,500 are satisfied with their HOA.

 

eVote and Email Your DC Reps re: FREEDOM OF SPEECH ON PRIVATE PROPERTY: Are the powers of homeowner associations overriding members’ constitutional rights (e.g., free speech)?